Comments on: Regarding the contest, is three weeks too little time?

By: FLeeF

FLeeF — Sun, 09 Mar 2008 23:33:05 +0000

Yeah! Extend the darn deadline! What do you think we are super… Oh you already did. Never mind, and thank you!

By: Overman

Overman — Sun, 09 Mar 2008 22:33:02 +0000

Good enough for me. I’ll put the word out on a new date ASAP. Thanks very much!

By: AngriBuddhist

AngriBuddhist — Sun, 09 Mar 2008 20:19:15 +0000

Right after reading the original post, I started brainstorming ideas. Later, I realized that I’d have to quit my job or severely neglect my girlfriend if I wanted to finish a project in time.

By: ricky grove

ricky grove — Sun, 09 Mar 2008 18:08:37 +0000

I have to agree with Tom and Krad; there needs to be more time for people to work on their entries. I’d recommend another month. Perhaps you could extend the contest to April 28?

By: kradproductions

kradproductions — Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:53:16 +0000

For me, March is always the busiest time of the year. If I were entering, I’d appreciate more time. Perhaps April 3 or April 10? That way people would have a weekend before it’s due to polish, ETC.

By: Tom

Tom — Sun, 09 Mar 2008 15:26:25 +0000

I must admit that my first impression was how great idea it is but why in hell you think something decent can be done in two - three weeks.
It can be done, of course, but quality will suffer.
Plus, we are all constantly in some other projects; maybe you can give time - week or two more - to people to finish other work.
I don’t know, I will probably enter what ever you decide, but it will be much more comfortable with week or two more - more authors will enter with more quality stuff. At the end, this is not some minor commercial for new line of condoms - it is our only podcast, very important one, and it must be done properly.
Quick deadline feels less serious than subject deserve it.